Rabies virus neutralizing activity, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the monoclonal antibody mixture SYN023 in combination with rabies vaccination: Results of a phase 2, randomized, blinded, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: SYN023-002 is a randomized, blinded, controlled study comparing rabies virus neutralizing activity (RVNA) and safety of SYN023, a monoclonal anti-rabies antibody mixture, to human-serum derived anti-rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) when administered with commercially available vaccines to healthy adult volunteers. METHODS: Participants were randomized among 4 treatment groups (SYN023 + Imovax, SYN023 + RabAvert, HyperRab + Imovax, HyperRab + RabAvert). On Day 0, subjects received 1 dose of RIG (0.3 mg/kg SYN023 or 20 IU/mL HyperRab) and their first of 5 vaccine doses. The primary objective was to compare cumulative RVNA between SYN023 and HyperRab recipients. Secondary objectives were to compare safety and to assess SYN023 pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. RESULTS: All 164 randomized subjects initiated treatment and were included in safety analyses. At least 34 subjects/treatment group received all treatment and had complete RVNA results, thus were included in the primary endpoint analysis. Mean RVNAs were approximately ten-fold higher in SYN023 recipients compared to HyperRab recipients until Day 14. From Day 14 onwards, mean RVNA was lower in SYN023 recipients, but remained above the RVNA level widely considered adequate (≥0.5 IU/mL) through Day 112 (study end). The point estimate of the cumulative RVNA (83.22% SYN023/HyperRab), but not the lower CI bound (90% CI: 66.06%, 104.83%), fell within the protocol-defined similarity margin. Each RIG + vaccine regimen appeared safe with mostly mild AEs and no serious or severe related events observed. Except injection site pain (22% HyperRab recipients vs. 6% SYN023 recipients), treatment-related AEs incidences were similar between RIGs. Anti-SYN023 antibodies were observed but had no apparent effects on PK or safety. CONCLUSIONS: SYN023 administered with commercially available vaccines provides adequate antibody coverage beginning earlier than other commercially available RIGs with an acceptable safety profile. Some suppression of vaccine response occurred, but RVNA levels ≥ 0.5 IU/mL were maintained throughout the relevant period. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02956746. FUNDING: Synermore biologics.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Neutralizing Activity of SYN023, a Mixture of Two Novel Antirabies Monoclonal Antibodies Intended for Use in Postrabies Exposure Prophylaxis.

SYN023 is a mixture of 2 humanized monoclonal antirabies antibodies (CTB011, CTB012). Two first-in-human studies evaluated ascending intramuscular (IM) injected doses (Study SYN023-001; N = 15) and IM vs subcutaneous (SC) administration (Study SYN023-003; N = 35) in healthy adults. In both studies, end points were safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics/rabies virus neutralizing activity (RVNA), and immunogenicity (anti-SYN023 antibodies). Adverse events were mild and infrequent at all doses tested by IM injection (0.3 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, 2.0 mg/kg), or by SC injection (0.3 mg/kg). There were no apparent trends in adverse event frequency or nature with increased dose or with administration route. Serum PK of SYN023 component antibodies appeared comparable to each other at each dose tested and when administered IM versus SC with serum exposure doubling over the second week after administration. At the lowest dose tested (0.3 mg/kg) by either IM or SC injection, RVNA levels exceeded the concentration generally accepted as protective against rabies (≥0.5 IU/mL) by day 1 after administration. Supra-inhibitory levels persisted >42 days. RVNA increased with higher doses. Anti-CTB011 and anti-CTB012 antibodies occurred with no apparent effect on PK or safety. These data support the potential use of SYN023 in antirabies postexposure prophylaxis.

Association of the Dundee severity classification with mortality, length of stay and readmission in adult inpatients with cellulitis.

Background: The Dundee classification is a simple severity assessment tool that could optimize treatment decisions and clinical outcomes in adult patients with cellulitis; however, it has not been validated in a large cohort. Objectives: To determine whether the Dundee classification reliably identified those patients with cellulitis who had a higher mortality, a longer length of hospital stay or an increased risk of readmission. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of all adults with a primary discharge diagnosis of cellulitis admitted to Auckland City Hospital from August 2013 to June 2015. We classified patients by severity using the Dundee scoring system. Results: The 30 day all-cause mortality in adult patients with a discharge diagnosis of cellulitis was 2% (29/1462) overall, and was 1% (10/806), 2% (6/271), 3% (10/353) and 9% (3/32) in Classes 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the Dundee classification, respectively (P = 0.01). Mortality was strongly associated with age >65 years (OR 9.37, 95% CI 3.00-41.23) and with heart failure (OR 6.16, 95% CI 2.73-14.23). There were significant associations between the Dundee classification and the incidence of bacteraemia, the length of hospital stay and the rate of readmission to hospital. Conclusions: The Dundee classification is a simple, reliable tool that can be easily applied in clinical settings to predict risk of mortality in order to determine which patients can be managed in the community with oral or intravenous therapy, and which require inpatient care.